CKT for Matter

By identifying core concepts related to a matter, we can begin to articulate specific elements of teachers CKT as those ideas intersect with the Work of Teaching Science framework. For example, elementary students learn about matter —its structures and properties, the physical and chemical changes it undergoes, and the particles that make it up. Investigations can be carried out to observe, measure, and identify various materials according to their properties, such as reflectiveness, color, and hardness. This topic area targets reversible and irreversible changes that happen to materials from heating, cooling, and mixing of substances. Evidence can be used to categorize changes such as those observed when (a) heating butter or an egg, or (b) freezing water or a leaf. Investigations address whether substances that interact in a chemical reaction become new substances with different properties. Evidence from these investigations can support an argument that the overall weight of the materials is conserved regardless of what change occurs, including the apparent disappearance of materials. Learning about matter also includes the idea that objects are made of small pieces that can be taken apart and recombined to form a new object and the idea that all matter consists of particles that are so small as to be invisible. Students are expected to develop a particle model that could explain why adding an invisible gas to a balloon increases its volume, or sugar added to a glass of water seems to disappear.

If we map each of these content ideas onto the various instructional tools in the Work of Teaching Science framework, we can identify specific elements of teachers’ CKT related to the teaching of matter, as shown below.

Intersections between content ideas and the Work of Teaching Science


Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.

Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109-1136.

Davis, E. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ critique of instructional materials for science. Science Education, 90(2), 348-375.

Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education93(4), 745-770.

Forbes, C. T., Sabel, J. L., & Biggers, M. (2015). Elementary teachers’ use of formative assessment to support students’ learning about interactions between the hydrosphere and geosphere. Journal of Geoscience Education63(3), 210-221.

Levin, D. T. (2013). Becoming a responsive science teacher: Focusing on student thinking in secondary science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Mikeska, J.N., Kurzum, C., Steinberg, J., & Xu, J. (2018). Assessing elementary science teachers’ content knowledge for teaching science for the ETS Educator Series: Pilot results. (Research Report No. RR-18-20). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Science teachers learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. Committee on Strengthening Science Education through a Teacher Learning Continuum. Board on Science Education and Teacher Advisory Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Phelps, G., Weren, B., Croft, A., & Gitomer, D. (2014). Developing content knowledge for teaching assessments for the Measures of Effective Teaching study (ETS Research Report No. RR-14-33). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117-148.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.